What is a brand?

by Peter Holmes on July 27, 2009

in Marketing

The word brand as it’s used today has become so ubiquitous it’s lost most, if not all meaning. From individuals, to rock bands, to countries, to religious and political ideologies – all now called brands – one has to wonder what brand really means anymore.

Even prototype products, yet to be named, are regularly called brands.

One of the worlds oldest brands.

Claimed to be the world's oldest brand.

The brand concept began in Sweden in the middle ages. A brand was a unique symbol burned into the flesh of a domestic animal to signify ownership. The branding iron wasn’t the brand, the mark on the animal was. And branding was the action taken to create the mark. The word “brand” is actually a degenerate of the old Norse word “brandr.” The Vikings may have spread the word “brandr” in England, where it was eventually incorporated into the language.

The meaning of a brand was later registered in the dictionary in 1552 as “An identifying mark made by a hot iron.” (online etymology dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper)

During the mid 19th century, the word brand began to be lightly used to differentiate products. However, the vast majority of products remained trademarks, labels, patents, etc., gradually becoming known as “name brand” or brand through the 20th century.

Then as today, there remained philosophical confusion in the meaning of brand, does a brand exist solely as a product, or does it exist solely in the customer’s mind, or both?

In 1960, Theodore Levitt who was then a lecturer in business administration at the Harvard Business School, wrote an article called “Marketing Myopia.” In the article Levitt claimed that “Management must think of itself not as producing products but as providing custom-creating value satisfactions.” Sound familiar to today’s mainly online idea of consumer customized products? Levitt claimed that firms that define their business myopically in product terms can stagnate even though the basic customer need they serve is enjoying healthy growth. His key contribution was based on defining the business in terms of the classic customer need rather than the product.

Although smart and insightful, Levitt was probably riffing on another man’s work. In 1954, Peter Drucker’s “The practice of management” placed marketing at the centre of the organization and proposed what became known as a marketing philosophy of business − “Marketing is not only much broader than selling, it is not a specialized activity at all. It is the whole business seen from the customer’s point of view.”

In 1980, Trout and Ries published their thoughts in “Positioning: The Battle for your Mind.” The concept “starts with the product…but it is not what you do to the product…but what you do to the mind of the prospect. That is, you position the product in the mind of the prospect.”  In other words, branding takes place in the customer’s mind.

Again, Peter Druker, in his 1973 book “Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices” wrote that “…because it is the purpose to create a customer, any business enterprise has two-basic functions: marketing and innovation…There will always, one can assume, be need for some selling. But the aim of marketing is to know and understand the customer so well that the product or service fits him and sells itself. Ideally, marketing should result in a customer who is ready to buy. All that should be needed then, is to make the product or service available.”

(Sounds like the inspiration for Alex Bogusky and John Winsor’s book, ‘Baked-In,’ where they more-or-less claim this as a new and revolutionary idea).

Today, branding is mostly thought of as adding value to a product. It’s rarely seen as an investment. It’s mostly seen by CEO’s and CFO’s as a luxury and accounted for as a cost. Therefore, when times are tough, it’s the first cost to be cut.

The problem is, branding isn’t optional and doesn’t go on vacation. If you don’t create your brand in the audience’s mind, they will do it for you.

The admired corporations, whether knowingly or unknowingly, have taken Peter Druker’s advice that a brand as the marketing object “…is the whole business seen from the customer’s point of view” and therefore view the brand as the central business idea and the impetus for everything the company does. This viewpoint breeds success.

Smart marketers should abandon the looser, and less useful meanings of the word “brand”, and focus instead on the one with the greatest potential to support their efforts in building their business.

That is, branding is a verb. It is the consistent, continuous and single-minded creation of a unique concept in the prospect’s mind, based on fulfilling rational and emotional needs. Therefore, a brand is not a product, it is an evolving concept in the customer’s mind.

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Mark,

    Thanks for the information. I will definitely read your article and respond.

    Peter Holmes
  • brandexpression
    Peter,

    Saw you post this on twitter. There's some great stuff here! It's great to see people actually researching what they do. Too many practitioners still think "branding" is simply logo design and naming.

    I'd like to add one thing. On May 13, 1931 Procter & Gamble’s Neil McElroy proposed the modern concept of “branding.” Through an internal memorandum, he proposed a new business strategy called “brand management." It's not just that he coined the terms "brand strategy," and "brand Management," but that he pioneered the concept of "product differentiation" and "brand differentiation" that really changed the game.

    This is discussed in a paper we authored: "What is Branding? A comprehensive look at the origin and function of branding." I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts (see link below).

    http://www.blackcoffee.com/brand-related/brand-...

    Mark Gallagher
    Brand Expressionist®
    BLACKCOFFEE
  • Peter - nice piece. Great historical perspective. One major change over the last few years is the ability of individuals to control brands. Branding as a verb happens from companies but is increasingly being co-opted and even taken over by everyday folks with a camera, a keyboard or a flip. We tend to see the press on the negative side of this..., see Comcast technician sleeping on the coach, Bob Garfied's "Comcast must die" blog, Dominoes employees spitting on a pizza, and on and on. What tends to get overlooked is the guy who tweets 3 times a week how much he loves his Oakley sunglasses, or the person who uploads pictures of every pair of brand x shoes to flickr or the dude who builds a flash game with a Mini Cooper in it just because he has a Mini and loves it. The notion that consumers have semi if not complete control over your brand is not new, What has changed is the power that people now hold due to social media. It's real and brands need to join in, not control, embrace the consumer, help shape the conversations, provide value and content and micro-market based upon passion points that connect consumers to elements of the brand.

    GW
    greg@woodhouseagency.com
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: