<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is “Buzz and Awesomeness” the Measure for Social Media Marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-the-measure-for-social-media-marketing-instead-of-roi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-the-measure-for-social-media-marketing-instead-of-roi/</link>
	<description>Intelligent brand thinking made engaging and spread through art and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: autom</title>
		<link>http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-the-measure-for-social-media-marketing-instead-of-roi/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>autom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-is-this-the-measure-for-social-media-in-place-of-roi/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>to an extent, the excessive content already generated (and continue to be generated) as attempts to explain, promote, embed in one&#039;s own marketing agenda, etc. surrounding social media has *already* brought about a great deal reticence, cynicism and suspicion. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and yes, nicely spotted when you note that a good number of social media proselytizers (oh yah, evangelists, preachers, freaks, whatev..)  have no proper marketing background. sadly, i suspect this phenomenon is a result of the dire need to address earning one&#039;s daily bread and doing so online, not unlike what happened in the initial &lt;a href=&quot;http://dot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dot.com&lt;/a&gt; bust actually. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but the call to action among those that do care (and have the proper background/training) about social media&#039;s successful transformation/evolution into a sound, viable tool is to help lead by example and educate. not preach. evangelization is not education.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2 cents..plenty of it..thanks for the share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to an extent, the excessive content already generated (and continue to be generated) as attempts to explain, promote, embed in one&#39;s own marketing agenda, etc. surrounding social media has *already* brought about a great deal reticence, cynicism and suspicion. </p>
<p>and yes, nicely spotted when you note that a good number of social media proselytizers (oh yah, evangelists, preachers, freaks, whatev..)  have no proper marketing background. sadly, i suspect this phenomenon is a result of the dire need to address earning one&#39;s daily bread and doing so online, not unlike what happened in the initial <a href="http://dot.com" rel="nofollow">dot.com</a> bust actually. </p>
<p>but the call to action among those that do care (and have the proper background/training) about social media&#39;s successful transformation/evolution into a sound, viable tool is to help lead by example and educate. not preach. evangelization is not education.</p>
<p>2 cents..plenty of it..thanks for the share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autom</title>
		<link>http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-the-measure-for-social-media-marketing-instead-of-roi/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>autom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-is-this-the-measure-for-social-media-in-place-of-roi/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>to an extent, the excessive content already generated (and continue to be generated) as attempts to explain, promote, embed in one&#039;s own marketing agenda, etc. surrounding social media has *already* brought about a great deal reticence, cynicism and suspicion. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and yes, nicely spotted when you note that a good number of social media proselytizers (oh yah, evangelists, preachers, freaks, whatev..)  have no proper marketing background. sadly, i suspect this phenomenon is a result of the dire need to address earning one&#039;s daily bread and doing so online, not unlike what happened in the initial &lt;a href=&quot;http://dot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dot.com&lt;/a&gt; bust actually. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;but the call to action among those that do care (and have the proper background/training) about social media&#039;s successful transformation/evolution into a sound, viable tool is to help lead by example and educate. not preach. evangelization is not education.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2 cents..plenty of it..thanks for the share</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to an extent, the excessive content already generated (and continue to be generated) as attempts to explain, promote, embed in one&#39;s own marketing agenda, etc. surrounding social media has *already* brought about a great deal reticence, cynicism and suspicion. </p>
<p>and yes, nicely spotted when you note that a good number of social media proselytizers (oh yah, evangelists, preachers, freaks, whatev..)  have no proper marketing background. sadly, i suspect this phenomenon is a result of the dire need to address earning one&#39;s daily bread and doing so online, not unlike what happened in the initial <a href="http://dot.com" rel="nofollow">dot.com</a> bust actually. </p>
<p>but the call to action among those that do care (and have the proper background/training) about social media&#39;s successful transformation/evolution into a sound, viable tool is to help lead by example and educate. not preach. evangelization is not education.</p>
<p>2 cents..plenty of it..thanks for the share</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fastfoodfilms</title>
		<link>http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-the-measure-for-social-media-marketing-instead-of-roi/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>fastfoodfilms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reasonpartners.com/2009/12/06/buzz-and-awesomeness-is-this-the-measure-for-social-media-in-place-of-roi/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Amen. All you need is one mild success to call yourself a social media expert, just as you only need one YouTube video with a few hits to call yourself a filmmaker. I was quite worried about both cases, but it won&#039;t take long for a few folks to be burned by a one hit wonder &#039;marketers&#039; sending the pendulum back the other way where people will need to have socmed credentials up the ying-yang before anyone will listen to them.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Social Media, outside of being in its infancy, is so layered and brimming with a potential for variety and innovation that it will be a long time before true experts emerge. Until then we will all come up with a bright ideas, fumble around in the dark, take risks, debate and reinvent inside the new playground. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems like selling has always been a dirty word, or at least the elephant in the room: you can sell all you want and people are fine with it, so long as you don&#039;t say the word or make it obvious. Selling is seen as something used car salesmen do, and in the socmed world, I think most will just find and replace the word &#039;selling&#039; with &#039;engaging&#039; whether anyone is truly engaged or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen. All you need is one mild success to call yourself a social media expert, just as you only need one YouTube video with a few hits to call yourself a filmmaker. I was quite worried about both cases, but it won&#39;t take long for a few folks to be burned by a one hit wonder &#39;marketers&#39; sending the pendulum back the other way where people will need to have socmed credentials up the ying-yang before anyone will listen to them.  </p>
<p>Social Media, outside of being in its infancy, is so layered and brimming with a potential for variety and innovation that it will be a long time before true experts emerge. Until then we will all come up with a bright ideas, fumble around in the dark, take risks, debate and reinvent inside the new playground. </p>
<p>It seems like selling has always been a dirty word, or at least the elephant in the room: you can sell all you want and people are fine with it, so long as you don&#39;t say the word or make it obvious. Selling is seen as something used car salesmen do, and in the socmed world, I think most will just find and replace the word &#39;selling&#39; with &#39;engaging&#39; whether anyone is truly engaged or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

